If you want to understand why companies make obviously bad decisions with very smart people in the room, here’s a fun little exercise: pull up your last board deck, your latest pipeline report, your project roadmap, and your leadership team’s weekly update. 

Now compare all of that to what actually happened in the last two weeks: the calls, the emails, the awkward pauses in meetings, the customer who stopped replying, the deal that “felt weird,” the dependency that no one quite owned. 

Ask yourself: where did reality live? 

Because it probably wasn’t in the slides. 

The most expensive thing in your company isn’t payroll or cloud spend or sales commissions. It’s the growing gap between what you think you know and what is actually happening. And that gap compounds quietly, like interest on a loan you forgot you took out. 

Not knowing doesn’t show up as a single failure. It shows up as a thousand small, reasonable decisions made on slightly wrong assumptions. 

The myth: “We’re informed” 

Most leadership teams believe they’re informed because they’re surrounded by information. Dashboards, reports, summaries, recaps, KPIs, OKRs, QBRs, and enough acronyms to qualify as a minor government agency. 

But information is not the same thing as knowing. 

Knowing requires context. It requires understanding how a decision was made, what was said before it, what was left unsaid, what assumptions were baked in, and what has changed since. 

Instead, most executives operate on compressed stories. A few bullet points. A status color. A confident sentence that begins with, “Overall, things look good.” 

And so leadership becomes an exercise in trusting second-hand reality. 

Which is fine, until it isn’t.

Second-hand reality has a shelf life 

A deal is “progressing” until the champion leaves the company. A project is “on track” until the dependency that lived in a side conversation quietly blocks everything. A customer is “happy” until procurement ghosts you. 

None of this is dramatic in the moment. It only becomes dramatic when the bill comes due. 

Not knowing is expensive because it doesn’t just create mistakes. It creates drift. You prioritize the wrong deal. You staff the wrong project. You escalate the wrong issue. You relax about the wrong risk. 

Each decision makes sense in isolation. Together, they build a company that is confidently moving in the wrong direction.

Why “not knowing” forces you to overcompensate 

When leaders can’t see clearly, they don’t stop deciding. They start padding. 

They add meetings to “stay close.” They ask for more updates to “be safe.” They insert more checkpoints to “reduce risk.” They slow execution to “make sure nothing is missed.” 

What looks like rigor is often just insurance against blindness. 

And insurance is never free. 

One unclear decision turns into five alignment calls. One missing signal turns into ten people preparing slides. One unowned commitment turns into a week of follow-ups. This is how a fast company slowly teaches itself to move cautiously. Not because the people got worse, but because the cost of not knowing got too high. 

Why this gets brutal at Series A and C-level 

At Series A, complexity explodes faster than structure. At C-level, leverage depends entirely on trusting what you don’t personally see. 

You cannot read every thread. You cannot attend every call. You cannot manually reconstruct every chain of decisions. So you live on abstractions. 

And abstractions are dangerous when the underlying signals are messy, emotional, and fragmented across conversations. A single sentence in a meeting transcript can matter more than an entire dashboard. A single offhand remark from a customer can matter more than a week of green status. 

But those signals live in the hidden layer of work. And if you don’t systematically capture, interpret, validate, and learn from them, you pay for it later. Usually in surprise. Often in churn. Sometimes in missed timing you can never get back. 

Why “more data” doesn’t fix it 

Most companies try to solve the cost of not knowing by adding more tools. More tracking. More reporting. More metrics. 

But the problem isn’t lack of data. It’s lack of grounded understanding. 

Work happens in communication. Decisions are formed in conversation. Risk appears as tone, hesitation, silence, and side comments long before it shows up in a system of record. If you only look at what people formally log, you are always behind reality. 

And being behind reality is the most expensive place a leader can be. 

Where Belt fits 

Belt exists because the true cost in modern companies is making decisions on partial, delayed, or overly optimistic pictures of what is actually happening. 

Instead of asking people to translate reality into updates, Belt observes work where it actually lives: in emails, meetings, calendars, threads, transcripts, and attachments. It treats these as signals, not noise, and runs them through a work intelligence loop that turns raw activity into validated understanding, confirmed decisions, traceable actions, and learned outcomes. 

That’s the difference between interpretation and intelligence. 

Interpretation tells you a story. Intelligence shows you what was decided, what changed, what’s still open, what’s blocked, and what needs attention now with evidence attached. 

So the cost of not knowing starts to disappear. Not because work gets simpler, but because reality becomes visible. 

And when leaders can see reality early, clearly, and in context, they stop paying for it later in delay, churn, anxiety, and lost momentum. 

And fewer surprises is the real return on work intelligence. 

Try Belt for Free